Eon vs. Druva

Druva delivers SaaS-based backup, focusing primarily on hosted snapshots, which offer less control over the data plane and deployment optimization.

Eon is infrastructure-free and fully cloud-native, with native integration for AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud workloads.

Druva requires tagging and policy creation to enforce protection coverage, increasing complexity at scale.

Eon removes this entirely:

• Auto-discovers workloads in real time
• Classifies data sensitivity
• Enforces policy at the resource level
• Detects gaps or misconfigurations proactively

Druva’s recovery options are limited to full system or image-based restores, with restrictions on the level of granularity available for recovery.
Eon offers:

• Direct access to files, records, and tables
• Global search across all backups
• Cross-region, cross-account, cross-cloud granular restore
• Recovery in seconds, not hours

While Druva provides immutability, it lacks built-in detection and rollback. Eon includes:

• Ransomware posture monitoring
• Snapshot anomaly detection
• Clean version hold post-retention
• Guided rollback and restore workflows

Druva pricing includes storage and support, but can still obscure costs through over-retention and inefficient backup models.

Eon lowers cost via:

• True incremental S3 backups
• No need for versioning or replication copies
• Deduplication across cloud accounts
• Exposes backup data in open, queryable formats (data lake)
• Flat, usage-based pricing